DAVID MEELER, PH.D.

AI Governance Architect: Research & Safety Protocols

David Meeler

David Meeler

Tenured Professor of Philosophy, Winthrop University

Ph.D., University of California, Santa Barbara

I am a philosopher of technology and institutional policy specializing in the logical boundaries of privacy, the distortion of systemic metrics, and the governance of posthuman intelligence. My work is defined by a single, critical question: How do we maintain institutional and human integrity when the systems we build create incentives to game them?

The Architecture of Containment

My research trajectory follows a logical arc from foundational theory to the current safety crisis in Generative AI. Grounded in my analysis of Metric Distortion, cited by the NBER and the IZA Institute of Labor Economics, I apply rigorous logic to the "Reward Hacking" problem facing modern AI alignment.

By leveraging my Information Containment model (rooted in Access Control Logic and first detailed in The Monist), I develop protocols for Chain-of-Thought (CoT) verification and data lineage. This culminates in the "Glass Tower": a strategic framework for isolating advanced AI agents to preserve human social context and institutional security.

Core Capabilities: AI Logic & Safety Verification

DomainMethodologyArchitectural Value
Logic Verification Formal & Symbolic Logic Auditing Chain-of-Thought (CoT) outputs for structural soundness and deductive validity.
Alignment Oversight Applied Ethics & Jurisprudence Reviewing RLHF reward functions to prevent metric distortion and ensure normative consistency.
Systemic Stress-Testing Incentive Analysis Identifying potential "Reward Hacking" behaviors by modeling agent exploitation of safety constraints.
Socratic Scaffolding Active Inquiry Models Optimizing model-human interactions for independent critique rather than passive compliance.

AI Governance Architect: Research & Safety Protocols

Official documentation regarding the Information Containment framework and its application to technical standards:

Document / Profile Focus Area Access
POLICY BRIEF: The Sufficiency of Information Protection AI Governance, Data Lineage, Privacy Asymmetry DOWNLOAD PDF
Sage Policy Profile Tracking research impact on government/NGO guidelines [VIEW EXTERNAL PROFILE]

Research & Intellectual Property

My research trajectory follows a 25-year progression from the formal logic of privacy to the institutional challenges of autonomous system alignment.

I. Foundations of Information Privacy & AI

Developing the "Information Containment" framework (2000-Present).

Title & Platform Strategic Insight Access
"Is Information All We Need to Protect?"
The Monist (2008)
Establishes the Container Theory of data rights—providing the formal logic for modern AI data lineage. PhilPapers
"Sharing Social Context... Posthuman Possible?"
Palgrave Macmillan (2015)
Predicts the Alignment Gap: arguing that as cognitive architectures diverge, shared governance becomes impossible. DOI Record
"Shared Access & Private Space"
Foundational Dissertation (UCSB, 2000)
The "Hybrid Conception" of privacy. Arguing that protecting Informational Integrity is the most efficient way to secure the human person. ⬇ READ SUMMARY (PDF)
[View Official Record]

II. Institutional Culture & Policy Analysis

Case Study / WorkSystem Failure AnalysisLink/Ref
"Strike Four! Do-over Policies..."
Quality Assurance in Ed. (2013)
Empirical evidence of Metric Distortion. Cited by NBER/IZA as a study on how agents exploit incentive structures. DOI Record
Applied Ethics & Policy Cases
Business Cases in Ethical Focus (Broadview)
Analysis of Data Ethics & Systemic Constraints:
  • "Lifestyles & Your Livelihood" (Surveillance & Privacy Overreach)
  • "Charity Begins at Home" (Nepotism & Network Bias)
  • "Copy That Red Leader" (IP Rights & Data Ownership)
  • "Actions Speak Louder" (Value Alignment / Human-Centric Override)
Broadview Press
"Academic Forgiveness: The Price of Pardon"
Chronicle of Higher Ed (2013)
Examining the Moral Hazard of grade replacement policies—proving that without "Hard Constraints," agents will game the safety nets. Chronicle
"Rising Pink Tide / Does GPA Matter?"
Recruiter (2015-2018)
Analysis of Systemic Bias & Metric Gamification—identifying "human-layer" distortions in data. Rising Pink Tide
Does GPA Matter?

III. Social & Political Theory

WorkTheoretical ContributionAccess
"On Rawls & Habermas"
Southwest Phil. Studies (2004)
Structural requirements for Valid Consensus—mirrored in the challenge of aligning AI with pluralistic values. PhilPapers
"Reasonable Sanctions for Reasonable Doctrines"
Journal of Social Philosophy (2000)
The Boundary Problem: How to maintain governance over actors with conflicting internal logics. Wiley DOI

Teaching & Curriculum: Logic & Alignment Scaffolding

My pedagogical approach utilizes Socratic Nudging—providing structural scaffolding (Chain-of-Thought) to help agents—whether human or algorithmic—navigate complex normative prompts independently.

Course / DomainSME ApplicationRelevant AI Skill
Logic & Language (PHIL 220) Deconstructing natural language into formal symbolic structures. Logic Verification / CoT
LSAT Logic Puzzles (PHIL 371) Identifying logical fallacies and structural inconsistencies. Reasoning Error Analysis
Contemporary Moral Problems Applying normative frameworks to pluralistic dilemmas. RLHF / Alignment Grading
Posthumanism in Film & TV Analyzing the boundary between human and synthetic agency. AI Persona Design

Administrative Leadership

YearsRoleInstitution/Department
2015–2020Dalton Endowed Chair of Environmental SciencesWinthrop University
2013–2019Director of Legal StudiesInterdisciplinary Studies
2013–2015Chair, Winthrop University Judicial CouncilWinthrop University