Public Opinion
PLSC 313
Spring 2008
Instructor: Dr.
Office: 344 Bancroft
Phone #: ext. 4669
(323-4669 from off campus)
email: huffmons@winthrop.edu
Web Page: http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/
Office Hours: Tuesdays & Thursdays 8am - 9am and 1:30pm - 2:30pm, and by appointment
Description
At the heart of a representative democracy lies the transmission of the will of the citizenry to the government. In order to have a full understanding of the shape of government and the choices made by the citizens, we must first comprehend what the “public will” is and how it is formed. The truth about American public opinion is that it is often fractious and malleable.
Goals
At the end of the course, the students should be able to answer the following questions: What does the fractious and malleable nature of public opinion mean for our democracy? How do Americans form opinions? How do Americans process information to create our political evaluations? How is American public opinion measured? What is the role of the media with respect to our opinions?
Course Requirements
Grades will be calculated using the following formula:
Midterm
Exam: 25%
Final Exam: 25% 3pm Thursday, May 1
Group
Project: 20%
Poll
Paper: 20%
Quizzes: 10%
Material for the exams will be
drawn from readings, lectures, and class discussions. Make up exams must be scheduled two weeks in
advance in the case of an unavoidable
planned absence; otherwise, make ups will be given only in the case of a documented illness or emergency. “Documented” means a legitimate doctor’s note
dating from prior to the exam. Any student health center note describing
vague symptoms dated the day of or after the exam will not be acceptable.
Group Project
You will be assigned to a group which will make a class presentation regarding the background, trends, and and current status of American public opinion for a randomly selected issue (I will randomly assign the issue to the group). Presentations should be approximately 10 – 15 minutes and should be multi-media in nature. Further details will be discussed in class. Presentations will occur the week of April 14 - 18.
Poll Paper
The primary way we measure public opinion in
The Polling Paper is due by the beginning of class Tuesday, March 4th. Papers will be penalized one full letter grade if it is not received by the beginning of class on the due data AND one full letter grade for each day late it is received thereafter. (What matters is when I get the paper....not when you slide it under my door...give it to the Administrative Specialist....put it in my departmental mailbox...)
Why do we do a
poll? The answer to this question is two-fold: (1)
as noted above, the primary way to gauge public opinion is through survey
research. This is a wonderful way to get
real world, hands-on survey research
experience. When you talk about
measuring public opinion in the future, you will speak from experience. (2) as an
institution,
PLSC 313: Public Opinion fulfills the University’s a number of Winthrop’s General Education program goals: Specifically, goals 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 7.1, & 7.2 For more information of General Education Goals, go to: http://www.winthrop.edu/universitycollege/GenEd/GNED%20Goals.htm
Class announcements will be made via the class
listserv. If you have an active
winthrop.edu email account, you should be automatically added to the listserv, otherwise you must add yourself to the
listserv. You are EXPECTED to regularly
check your email for class announcements!
If you are not on the class listserv, go HERE for instructions on how to sign up (the
course designator to sign up is: PLSC313001).
This syllabus may be revised
throughout the semester.
Required Texts
Erikson, Robert S. and Kent L. Tedin.
2005 "American Public Opinion" Seventh
Edition.
All other readings will be on a password protected site that may be found here: PLSC 313 Readings
Academic
Misconduct
Academic misconduct will not be tolerated. Winthrop’s Conduct Code
defines academic misconduct as:
”Academic misconduct includes but is not limited to providing or receiving
assistance in a manner not authorized by the professor in the creation of work
to be submitted for academic evaluation including papers, projects, and
examinations; presenting, as one's own, the ideas or words of another for
academic evaluation without proper acknowledgment; doing unauthorized academic
work for which another person will receive credit or be evaluated; and
presenting the same or substantially the same papers or projects in two or more
courses without the explicit permission of the professors involved. In
addition, academic misconduct involves attempting to influence one's academic
evaluation by means other than academic achievement or merit. More explicit
definitions of academic misconduct specific to certain academic disciplines may
be promulgated by academic departments and schools.
I will prosecute cases of academic misconduct to the fullest extent of
university policy, and that can mean expulsion from the university.
Obviously, any student caught cheating or plagiarizing, in any manner, on an
exam or assignment will receive a zero for that assignment in addition to
academic prosecution. Additionally, I reserve the right to award the
student an "F" in the course for ANY act of academic misconduct if I
feel it is warranted. This is in addition to academic prosecution by the
Dean of Students.
**ADDITIONALLY, the
Department of Political Science has it's own policies on plagiarism and
academic misconduct: Poli Sci Statement on Plagiarism In the immortal
words of Brad Hamilton: "Learn it; Know it; Live it!"**
|
Topics and
|
|
Introduction to Public Opinion ►E&T Chpt. 1 ►Zaller: “Information, predispositions, and opinion” (chpt. 2 from The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion) |
|
Measuring Public Opinion ►E&T Chpt. 2 ►Zaller: “Making it up as you go along” (chpt. 5 from The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion) RAS Model ►Oldendick & Bardes: “How public opinion data are used” (chpt 3 from Public Opinion: Measuring the American Mind) ►Oldendick & Bardes: “How are opinions measured” (chpt 4 from Public Opinion: Measuring the American Mind) ►Lawrence: “Sophistication” |
|
Is the American Public Stupid? Understanding Uncertainty and
Inconsistency in Public Opinion ► Alvarez and Brehm – Abortion |
|
Opinion Formation I: Socialization ►E&T Chpt. 5 ►Sears & Levy: “Childhood and adult political development” (from Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology) (Parent-Child Income) |
|
Opinion Formation II: Creation of Opinions and Evaluations ►Lau: “Models of decision making” (from Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology) ►Rahn, Aldrich, Borgida, & Sullivan: “A Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal” (from Information and Democratic Processes) ►Rahn, Aldrich, & Borgida:
“Individual and Contextual Variations in Political Candidate Appraisal” (from
March 1994 American Political Science
Review) ►Masters & Sullivan: “Nonverbal behavior and leadership: Emotion and cognition in political information processing” (chpt. 6 from Explorations in Political Psychology) ►Gilens: “Political ignorance and collective policy preferences” (from June 2001 American Political Science Review) |
|
Trends in Public Opinion ►E&T Chpt. 4 ►Page & Shapiro: “Opinions about social issues” (chpt. 3 from The Rational Public) |
|
The Media and Public Opinion ►E&T Chpt. 8 ►Zaller: “The myth of massive media impact revived: New support for a discredited idea.” (chpt 2 from Political Persuasion and Attitude Change) ►Miller & Krosnick: “News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: A program of research on the priming hypothesis” (chpt 3 from Political Persuasion and Attitude Change) |
|
The Opinion Connection: The Public and
its Leaders ►E&T Chpt 10 ►Kuklinski & Hurley: “It’s a matter of interpretation” (Chpt. 5 from Political Persuasion and Attitude Change) |
|
The Electoral Connection ►E&T Chpt. 9 ►White, Huffmon, & Martin: “Split decision in the 1996 elections: A Democratic presidency and a Republican Congress.” (from March/April 1998 Votes & Opinions) |
Buy a journal (the black & white type). Take at least one journal page worth of notes on each individual reading / chapter we cover in class. You will be awarded extra points on your final exam based on the total number of readings for which you have taken notes. I will be checking journals to tally points regularly throughout the semester. As an added incentive, you will be allowed to use your notes from these journals during quizzes.