Winthrop University
The Department of Political Science
Fall 2013
Course: |
PLSC 490 Section 001: Senior Capstone in Political Science (3 credit
hours) |
|
Time & Location: |
Monday & Wednesday 3:30-4:45 ♦ Bancroft 339 |
|
Instructors: |
Dr. Scott Huffmon |
Dr. Stephen Smith |
Office Locations: |
344 Bancroft |
338 Bancroft
|
Office Hours: |
Mondays 12:15-1:15pm;
|
Monday 12:15-1:15; 9:15-9:45 |
Contact Info: |
Phone: 803.323.4669
Fax: 803.323.2568
E-mail: huffmons@winthrop.edu |
Phone: 803.323.4661
Fax: 803.323.2568
E-mail: smiths@winthrop.edu |
Course Description and Goals
This course is designed to provide all Political Science degree-seeking students
with a team-taught, culminating capstone experience. We
will collectively discuss a diverse set of readings that provide a comprehensive
overview of the major theories and methods in each of the subfields in the
discipline: American Politics, Political Theory, Comparative Politics,
International Politics, Public Law, Public Policy, and Public Administration.
PLSC 350, a total of 21 hours of political science course credit, and senior
status are prerequisites for this course.
There are two main goals for the course. The first is to provide an overview of
the theories and methods of the discipline. The second is to provide a capstone
experience through the writing of a lengthy research paper. Therefore, students
will, in consultation with their professors, select, design, and write an
original research paper to be presented to the class at the end of the semester.
This course meets the University’s Intensive
Writing requirement.
It also contributes
to the mastery of the following university-level
competencies (ULCs):
1. |
Competency 1: Winthrop graduates think
critically and solve problems Winthrop University graduates reason logically, evaluate and use evidence, and solve problems. They seek out and assess relevant information from multiple viewpoints to form well-reasoned conclusions. Winthrop graduates consider the full context and consequences of their decisions and continually reexamine their own critical thinking process, including the strengths and weaknesses of their arguments. |
2. |
Competency 2: Winthrop graduates are personally and socially
responsible.
Winthrop graduates value integrity, perceive moral dimensions, and
achieve excellence. They take seriously the perspectives of
others, practice ethical reasoning, and reflect on experiences.
Winthrop graduates have a sense of responsibility to the broader
community and contribute to the greater good.
|
4. |
Winthrop University graduates communicate effectively.
Winthrop graduates communicate in a manner appropriate to the subject,
occasion, and audience. They create texts – including but not limited to
written, oral, and visual presentations – that convey content
effectively. Mindful of their voice and the impact of their
communication, Winthrop graduates successfully express and exchange
ideas. |
This course participates in the Global
Learning Initiative,
especially in its discussions of Comparative Politics and International
Relations.
Student Learning Outcomes
At the end of this class, students will be able to: (1) effectively demonstrate
an understanding of the diverse theories and methods employed in the discipline
of Political Science; (2) prepare a professional, original, research paper in
the field of political science that may be used in one or more of the following
capacities: as a graduate school or employment writing sample; to deliver at a
state, regional, national, or international Political Science conference; to
complete an Honors Thesis requirement; to demonstrate proficiency in the design,
implementation, and writing of an original political science research project.
Requirements and Guidelines
It is our sincere
hope that each student will do well in the course. For this to happen,
students must live up to the responsibilities and requirements outlined in this
syllabus. Each student will be expected to:
1. |
Complete the readings prior
to the class in which the material will be discussed.
|
2. |
Attend class, participate in classroom activities, and take notes. Regular
attendance is expected and required. Excessive absences will lower your
grade in two ways: (1) the loss of notes from lecture and discussion;
(2) the loss of participation opportunities. Participation— which
requires your presence—will raise or lower grades on the border line. Please
contact the instructors if prolonged illness or other problems cause you
to miss class for an extended period. In
addition, every student must be in class on time. Arriving
late or leaving early disrupts the class and is unacceptable.
|
3. |
Show sensitivity and respect for
your colleagues and the professors. Our
classroom is a place for lively exchange of ideas and discussion. All
students, however, will treat their peers with courtesy, even if they
disagree.
Next, displaying good manners also includes turning off and storing all
mobile phones, IPods, and other personal electronic devices before the
start of class. (Note: We will answer
your phone if it rings. Also,
if you are caught sending a text message, then you will be summarily
dismissed.) Students
may tape record lectures and class discussions, and may take notes on
laptop computers. Similarly, use of a laptop to reference JSTOR and
other online articles during class discussions is encouraged. However,
use of a laptop, unless it is an accommodation required for a
disability, is a privilege that we will revoke if we learn that students
are engaged in activities that are irrelevant to the course and
disruptive to other students. This
includes checking email and using social media sites. Further,
If the instructors determine that recording in the classroom is
inhibiting the free-flow of discussion or making any student
uncomfortable, it will be disallowed.
Lastly, note that any unauthorized use of personal electronic
devices—including but not limited to cell phones—during
examinations will be taken as prima
facie evidence
of academic misconduct. We will immediately confiscate the exam of any
student caught using such devices. The student will not be permitted to
complete the test and the incident will be reported to University
authorities. For
more details, please see the
College of Arts and Science Policy for Appropriate Use of Hand-held and
Wireless Technology.
|
4. |
Hand in assignments on the date they are due; take examinations on the
date that they are scheduled. Students
must take exams on the days they are assigned. Written assignments and
take home examinations are due at
or before the start of class on
the specified due date. A student may take a make-up examination or
submit an assignment late in case of emergency. In such circumstances,
the student must call or email one of the instructors on the due date of
the exam or assignment and be prepared to provide documentation of the
emergency. The instructors will determine whether a make-up exam will be
administered and/or the degree of penalty (if any) that will be assessed
on late assignments.
|
5. |
Upload all writing assignments to TurnItIn.com
|
6. |
Make suggestions on
how the course could be improved.
|
7. |
Abide by the Winthrop University Student Code
of Conduct. (see
p. 37) |
Required Readings
Marsh, David and Gerry Stoker, eds. 2010. Theory
and Methods in Political Science, 3rd edition.
New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Scott, Gregory M. and Stephen M. Garrison. 2011. The
Political Science Students Writer’s Manual,
7th edition.
New Jersey: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
All other required materials are available via
the following password protected web site: http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm
Student Learning Activities, Evaluation, and Grading
Students will participate in the following learning activities and will be
evaluated and graded based on the criteria described below:
1. |
Midterm Examination (30%): This
course is divided into two sections. The first focuses on the subfields
of and epistemological approaches to Political Science. Students’
understanding of these topics will be measured via the midterm exam.
The midterm exam may consist of essay, multiple choice, short answer, or
fill in the blank in any proportion or combination. The
second section turns to writing the capstone paper. Students will be
evaluated based upon their final manuscript.
|
2. |
Attendance, Readings and Class Participation (10%): Attendance
and participation are important aspects of your grade and students must
keep up with the required readings. This
course is designed to be a participatory seminar in which both faculty
and students participate in generating knowledge. As a result, students
are required to read and think about all assigned materials before
class, and to come to class ready to engage the material. To this end,
the instructors reserve the right to give quizzes and/or writing
response exercises to evaluate your competent fulfillment of these
obligations. Any
such evaluation will be part of your participation grade. The
instructors will look favorably upon participation in discussion boards
and wikis on Blackboard. Moreover, feel free to come to us with any
questions, comments, or concerns that you may have as the class
progresses.
During the Writers’ Workshop portions of the class, students will be
expected to present or discuss the progress they are making on their
papers. All students should come prepared to discuss the relevant
portion of their papers during each class period.
|
3. |
Research Paper (50%): The
central work product students will generate in this course is a lengthy (25-30
pages) research
paper in which students will choose a topic and, using one of the
epistemological approaches covered in this course, generate new
knowledge about the topic. Each
student’s grade on the assignment will be determined on the quality of
her/his final research paper. However, to ensure that each student
writes a paper that reflects her/his best work, the assignment is broken
down into several required components.
While these components are not individually graded, we will penalize the
final paper grade if a student does not complete and submit each
component on the designated due date. For
more details, see Appendix 1.
Finally, consistent with University Level Competency #2, Personal and
Social Responsibility, all students engaging in research
on human subjects will
undergo CITI
training, and apply for approval by the Winthrop
University Institutional Review Board, even if their projects
are exempt under 45CFR46. The applications must be complete and include
all necessary signatures.
|
4. |
Presentation (10%): In
lieu of a final examination, each student will present her/his paper to
the professors and the entire class during the final examination period.
Students may present the paper using PowerPoint, posters or other means.
Each presentation should be no
more than 10 minutes long. |
Grading:
A |
93-100 = A
90-92 = A- |
Designates work of superior quality
Class participation is voluntary, frequent, relevant, and reflects that
you have both read and thought about the material. Performance
on exams is consistently strong; demonstrates complete mastery of facts
and concepts. Written
work is clear, well-organized and thought-provoking, and free of
grammatical or mechanical errors.
|
B |
87-89 = B+
83-86 = B
80-82 = B- |
Designates work of high quality
Class participation is voluntary, frequent, and reflects that you are
keeping up with the assigned materials. Performance
on exams is very strong; demonstrates mastery of facts and concepts. Written
work reflects a good understanding of the issues and concepts. Writing
is clear with minimal errors.
|
C |
77-79 = C+
73-76 = C
70-72 = C- |
Designates work that minimally meets the course requirements
Class participation is occasional and/or rarely voluntary, with comments
that reveal only a superficial grasp of issues and concepts. Performance
on exams demonstrates acceptable degree of mastery of facts and
concepts. Written
work may contain arguments that are confusing, with minimal evidence of
organization. Writing
is marred by errors.
|
D |
67-69 = D+
63-66 = D
60-62 = D- |
Reflects minimal clarity and comprehension
Class participation is minimal, never voluntary, and reveals that you
have either have not read the assigned materials or did not understand
the readings. Performance
on exams demonstrates minimal mastery of facts and concepts. Written
work is confusing, contradictory, repetitive, and/or not supported by
either your own ideas or your sources. Writing
is marred by errors.
|
F |
0-59 = F |
Unsatisfactory performance along
most (or all) measures. |
The “N” Grade Issue: This
semester, the deadline to withdraw from a course with an automatic grade of “N”
is Friday,
October 19. Students
may not withdraw from the course after this date without documented extenuating
circumstances.
Note: Both
instructors are equally involved in course development, instruction and student
evaluation. The two instructors will grade each assignment independently and
then discuss each student’s assigned grade. While each student may work more
closely with one of the instructors on his/her research paper, both instructors
will read each component and provide feedback to the student.
Assignment and Examination Schedule
Topics paper |
Week 7 |
Monday |
October 7 |
CITI Training |
Week 8 |
Wednesday |
October 9 |
Midterm examination |
Week 9 |
Wednesday |
October 23 |
Draft No. 1 (8 pages) |
Week 10 |
Wednesday |
October 30 |
Draft No. 2 (16 pages) |
Week 11 |
Wednesday |
November 6 |
Draft No. 3 (24 pages) |
Week 13 |
Wednesday |
November 20 |
Final paper (25-30 pages) |
Week 14 |
Monday |
December 2 |
Final presentation |
|
Monday |
December 10, 3pm |
Syllabus Change Policy and Course Calendar
Note:
The syllabus and/or course calendar will be adjusted to accommodate events that
provide significant learning opportunities for students, weather conditions, guest
speakers, etc.
Additionally, a more detailed syllabus and/or course calendar may be issued at
the discretion of
the instructors.
Date |
|
|
|
Week 1 |
PART I: WHAT IS PLSC? THE DISCIPLINE, ITS SUBFIELDS, AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL
APPROACHES
|
|
|
Aug 21 |
Goals of the course
Writing Big Papers:
Topics, Strategies, and Sources |
|
|
Aug 26 |
The History of the Discipline:
Gunnell (available
via the following password protected web site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm);
Scott and Garrison, Glossary of PLSC Terms |
|
|
Week 2 |
|
|
|
Aug 28 |
Understanding Ontology and Epistemology: Marsh
and Stoker, Introduction, Chapter 9 |
|
|
Sept 2 |
Behavioral Analysis: Marsh and Stoker, Introduction to Part 1 and
Chapter 1 |
|
|
Week 3 |
|
|
|
Sep 4 |
Normative Theory: Plato:
http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/republic.2.i.html |
|
|
Sep 9 |
Digeser (available via the following password protected web site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm) |
|
|
Week 4 |
|
|
|
Sep 11 |
Constructivism and Interpretive Theory, Marsh and Stoker, Chapter 4 |
|
|
Sep 16 |
Dahl available via the following password protected web site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm);
Bachrach and Baratz (available via the following password protected web
site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm) |
|
|
Week 5 |
|
|
|
Sep 18 |
The Institutional Approach Approach: Marsh and Stoker, Chapter 3;
Diermeier & Krehbiel (available via the following password protected web
site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm) |
|
|
Sep 23 |
Political Psychology: Marsh and Stoker, Chapter 5; Lane “Political
Psychology” Epilogue (available via the following password protected web
site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm); Westin,
et. al. “Neural Bases of Motivated Reasoning” (available via the
following password protected web site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm)
|
|
|
Week 6 |
|
|
|
Sep 25 |
Rational Choice: Marsh and Stoker, Chapter 2; Page & Shapiro, “The
Rational Public,” chpt 1 (available via the following password protected
web site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm) |
|
|
Sep 30 |
Marxism, Structure and Agency: Marsh and Stoker, Ch. 7 and 10 (in
particular 215—220); Manley (available via the following password
protected web site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm)
|
|
|
Week 7 |
|
|
|
Oct 2 |
Feminism, Critical Race Theory, and Intersectionality
Marsh and Stoker, Ch. 6; Crenshaw (available via the following password
protected web site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm);
Fraser and Gordon (available via the following password protected web
site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm) |
|
|
Oct 7 |
Public Law and Public Administration Lindblom (available via the
following password protected web site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm); Waldo
(available via the following password protected web site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm); Black (available
via the following password protected web site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm) |
Topics Paper Due |
|
Week 8 |
|
|
|
Oct 9 |
Comparative Politics:
Marsh and Stoker, Ch. 14; Bunce (available via the following password
protected web site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm) |
Complete CITI Training |
|
Oct 16 |
International Relations:
Singer (available via the following password protected web site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm) |
|
|
Week 9 |
|
|
|
Oct 21 |
Quantitative and Qualitative Method: Marsh and Stoker, Ch. 12 and 13;
Laitin
“The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science”
(available via the following password protected web site:
http://faculty.winthrop.edu/huffmons/490reading.htm)
|
|
|
Oct 23 |
Midterm |
Midterm |
Midterm |
|
PART II: COMPLETING AND POLISHING THE RESEARCH PAPER
|
|
|
Week 10 |
In-Class
Writing Workshop:
Understanding APSA Style,
Organizing the Literature Review, Linking Your Research
Question to Your Methodology.
Scott and Garrison, Ch. 5 and Appendix A;
Marsh and Stoker, Conclusion;
Winthrop Writing Center, “Evaluating Internet Sources” |
|
|
Oct 28 |
In-Class
Writing Workshop:
Developing Your Research Question, Honing Your Methodology, Identifying
and Collecting Data, Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods
Scott and Garrison, Ch. 4 and 9;
Stoker and Marsh Ch. 11 |
|
|
Oct 30 |
In-Library Instructors’ Conferences: Research Question and Data
Collection Final Day to Discuss Changing Paper Topic with Instructors |
Draft 1 due (8 pages) |
|
Week 11 |
|
|
|
Nov 4 |
In-Library Instructors’ Conferences |
|
|
Nov 6 |
In-Class Writing Workshop: Peer Evaluations,
Instructor Conferences |
Draft 2 due (16 pages) |
|
Week 12 |
|
|
|
Nov 11 |
In-Class Writing Workshop: Peer Evaluations,
Instructor Conferences |
|
|
Nov 13 |
In-Class Writing Workshop: Peer Evaluations,
Instructor Conferences |
|
|
Week 13 |
|
|
|
Nov 18 |
In-Class Writing Workshop: Compiling Your Evidence,
Making an Argument Writing Up Your Data Analysis,
Finding Your Conclusion
Scott and Garrison, Ch. 10 |
|
|
Nov 20 |
In-Class Writing Workshop: Writing Competently/Paper
Formats Discuss ALL FINAL Remaining Problems
and Questions |
Draft 3 due (24 pages) |
|
Week 14 |
|
|
|
Nov 25 |
In-Class Writing Workshop: Peer Evaluations,
Instructor Conferences |
|
|
Nov 25 |
Political Science Assessment Instrument
Senior Exit Survey
Student Course Evaluations |
|
|
Dec 2 |
|
Final drafts due in each of our offices by 12
PM |
|
Dec 10 |
|
Final Paper Presentations |
3 p.m. |
Institutional Support Services
Winthrop’s Academic Success Center is a free resource for all undergraduate
students seeking to perform their best academically. The ASC offers a
variety of personalized and structured resources that help students become
effective and efficient learners. The services available to students are as
follows: peer tutoring, academic skill development (test taking strategies, time
management counseling, and study techniques), group and individual study spaces,
and academic coaching. The ASC is located in University College on the
first floor of Dinkins Hall, Suite 106. Please contact the ASC at (803)
323-3929 or success@winthrop.edu.
Not everything can be found online. Dacus
Library is the primary on-campus provider of scholarly information in all forms
from print to electronic. To
fulfill its mission, the library provides information quickly, efficiently, and
in sufficient depth to promote excellence in all academic programs offered by
the university. Additionally,
the library maintains depository status for federal and state publications. For
information on library hours call (803) 323-2362.
Students who wish to improve their writing skills should seek assistance from
the Writing Center, located at 242 Bancroft. Tutors
works with students on an individual basis in all phases of the writing process
and on academic and writing projects in any discipline. Call
(803) 323-2138 for information regarding hours of operation and services.
The Office of Disability
Services
Winthrop University is dedicated to providing access to education. If you
have a disability and require specific accommodations to complete this course,
then contact the Office of Disability Services at (803) 323-3290. Once you
have your official notice of accommodations from ODS, please inform me as early
as possible in the semester.
The Office of Victims
Assistance
The Office of Victims Assistance (OVA) provides services to survivors of sexual
assault, intimate partner violence, and stalking as well as educational
programming to prevent these crimes from occurring. The staff assists all
survivors, regardless of when they were victimized in obtaining counseling,
medical care, housing options, legal prosecution, and more. In addition,
the OVA helps students access support services for academic problems resulting
from victimization. The OVA is located in 204 Crawford and can be reached
at (803) 323-2206. In the case of an after-hours emergency, please call
Campus Police at (803) 323-3333, or the local rape crisis center, Safe Passage,
at their 24-hour hotline, (803) 329-2800.
Academic Honesty and Integrity
The Student
Conduct Code notes,
“A fundamental tenet of all institutions of higher learning is academic
honesty. Academic
work must depend upon respect for an acknowledgement of the research and ideas
of others. Misrepresentation
of someone else’s work as one’s own is a most serious offense in any academic
setting.” Winthrop
University is no exception. In
short, academic integrity is very important and misconduct, in any form, will
not be condoned. If
you have any questions regarding academic honesty and student conduct, please
review Section
V of
the Student Conduct Code.
Political Science Department Statement on Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct
The Winthrop University Political Science department abhors all forms of
academic misconduct, and faculty members aggressively investigate all incidents
of suspected cheating. This includes, but is not limited to, using turnitin.com.
Plagiarism, whether intentional or unintentional, is by far the most common form
of academic misconduct in
the Political Science department. Plagiarism includes, but is not limited to:
· Using
the words or ideas of others as one’s own;
· Reproducing,
in whole or in part, principal ideas from a fellow student’s work;
· Granting
a fellow student permission to copy one’s paper, or to reproduce some or all of
its principal ideas;
· Quoting
or paraphrasing material from sources without any citation;
· Quoting
or paraphrasing material without sufficient and/or proper citation;
· Omitting
some or all sources used in a paper; and
· Submitting
a paper written for one course – whether in Political Science or another
discipline – to meet a course requirement in a second course, without
the express permission of all instructors involved. This
is the case even though many paper topics may be relevant to several different
courses.
All incidents of suspected academic misconduct are investigated with equal
vigor.
When a faculty member suspects that a student engaged in academic misconduct,
the faculty member will follow the appropriate procedures outlined in the Student
Handbook.
The faculty member will apply whatever sanctions s/he deems appropriate.
Possible sanctions include, but are not limited to:
· Failing
the assignment;
· Requiring
a student to repeat an assignment for reduced credit;
· Requiring
a student to repeat an assignment for no credit; or
· Failing
the course.
Academic misconduct applies equally to required assignments and extra credit
assignments.
HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH AND IRB APPROVAL
Consistent with University Level Competency #2, Personal and Social
Responsibility, all students engaging in research on human subjects will undergo CITI
training, and apply for approval by the Winthrop
University Institutional Review Board, even if their projects are
exempt under 45CFR46. The applications must be complete and include all
necessary signatures.
Any student seeking IRB approval may not begin to collect data for her/his
research until s/he has received IRB approval or been informed that the research
is exempt. Collecting data prior to receiving IRB approval is grounds for an
academic misconduct charge.
All incidents of academic misconduct will be reported to the Department Chair,
the Dean of Students, the Dean of Arts and Sciences and the student’s academic
advisor. The University may impose its own sanctions in addition to sanctions
imposed by the faculty member or the department. The University may impose
sanctions even after a student has graduated, and may include revoking a
student’s diploma.
In addition, students who engage in more than one incident of academic
misconduct may be declared ineligible for departmental awards, ineligible for
employment in the department or its affiliated programs, and ineligible to
volunteer as a peer advisor.
Appendix 1: Research Paper Requirements
The
central component of this course is a lengthy research paper, in which students
will generate new knowledge on a topic of political science. We recognize that
this undertaking is new to most students, and may be intimidating. Consequently,
we have broken down the research paper into five components. Only the last
component, the final research paper, will be graded. To
ensure that students can produce the best possible paper, however, the other
components are required,
even though are ungraded. As a result, each student’s final assignment will be
penalized if she or he fails to complete any or all of the first four elements,
or turns them in late.
The ungraded components are: 1) The Topic and Supporting Materials Paper; 2)
Instructor’s Conferences; 3) Peer Review of the 8 page and 16 page drafts; and
4) Complete Rough Draft. We expect students to put in an honest effort on these
assignments. The better your work on these ungraded components, the higher the
quality of the feedback we can provide you, and the better your final paper will
be. If
we are not satisfied with the quality of these required, ungraded components, we
may require you to redo an assignment and/or penalize the grade on the Research
Paper.
1) The Topic and Supporting Materials Paper (500-word minimum)
With this assignment, each student will describe her or his topic, articulate a
specific central research question and thesis, explain the methodological
approached used to pursue the research question, and discuss data sources
(quantitative and/or qualitative). Students
will also submit an annotated bibliography.
In the annotated
bibliography, each
student must list and describe at least eight sources that she or he has
consulted and will use in the paper. Each entry should be 2-5 sentences long. The
annotated bibliography must include at least two relevant scholarly
books,
at least three scholarly,
peer-reviewed articles,
and no more than two contemporary news
articles.
Note that the following sources are inappropriate for
this and all writing assignments: Wikipedia, About.com, Infoplease.com, Spark
Notes or other online sources not vetted by an editor or peer reviewed (blogs,
personal websites, and the like are examples); encyclopedias; textbooks.
2) Instructor’s Conferences
We expect students to meet with both instructors to receive suggestions on how
to improve their work. The first conference will be held after the Topic Paper
is submitted during
two
in-class workshops scheduled for October
28 and 30.
The conference will help the student design and complete the paper. Subsequent
conferences can be scheduled on an as needed basis. Professors and students may
request additional consultations if they so choose. While their peers are
conferencing, each student must continue working on identifying sources,
reading, collecting and analyzing data, and drafting their paper. At
the end of each session, students will submit a “What Did You Do For Your Paper
Today?” report as part of your class participation grade.
3) Peer Reviews
We expect students to participate fully in the peer-review component of this
assignment. Students will bring the assigned portions of their papers to class
for distribution to a small group of classmates, who will critique their work. Students
must provide substantive criticism of their colleagues’ papers and will complete
a written peer review form to turn in to us and share with their partners.
4) The Incomplete Drafts (Draft Nos. 1 and 2)
Students are required to complete the paper in stages. The components and
lengths of these drafts are listed above. These drafts will adhere to all of the
requirements of the research paper, and the instructors and peers will provide
specific comments on the content of the paper and make suggestions for
improvement. Students
will bring each required draft to the class with them, as well as to submit each
draft to TurnItIn.com before
the start of class. Each day a draft is late, the paper loses 10% of the grade. Students
are expected take these comments seriously and to incorporate them into
subsequent drafts.
5) The Complete Rough Draft (Draft No. 3)
This draft will adhere to all of the requirements of the research paper and will
be a minimum of 24
pages long,
and the instructors will provide specific comments on the content and
suggestions for improvement. Students are expected to take these comments
seriously and to substantially revise the draft for the final paper. Students
will bring each required draft to the class with them, as well as to submit each
draft to TurnItIn.com before
the start of class. Each day a draft is late, the paper loses 10% of the grade.
6) The Final Research Paper
This paper will be 25-30
pages in
length and include a minimum of 20 outside, peer-reviewed sources other
than the
data used in the paper. Students will use APSA
style.
The paper must focus on a topic germane to political science, and include the
following elements:
RESEARCH PAPER GRADING INFORMATION
The paper will account for 50 percent of the course grade. The grade is based on
the quality of the final product. However, those students who failed to complete
all components of the assignment will see their final paper grades penalized.
The penalties for missed components are as follows:
Students with a documented emergency that results in missing a component’s
deadline will
not be
penalized.
Students will bring each required draft to the class with them, as well as to
submit each draft to TurnItIn.com before
the start of class. Each day a draft is late, the paper loses 10% of the grade.