Art History 176 * Fall
2012
T/R 9:30-10:45am
Renaissance to Modern
Botticelli 15th – Cindy Sherman 20th
Dr. Laura
Rinaldi Dufresne
office hours
11-noon TR & by appointment
McLaurin 102 x2661,
dufresnel@winthrop.edu
Website: http://faculty.winthrop.edu/dufresnel
REQUIRED
READINGS:
Laurie Schneider Adams, Art Across
Time Vol. II, any recent edition
RECOMMENDED
TEXTS:
James Hall, Dictionary of Subjects & Symbols
in Art, reference, Dacus
Sylvan Barnett, A Short Guide to
Writing About Art, reserve, Dacus
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
A survey of the art and architecture in Western Civilizations from the Renaissance
to the Present.
A work of art is more than just the
sum of its parts, but reflects the world in which it was produced. It is my hope that this fast-paced survey of
art from the Renaissance to yesterday will be more than just painful memorization
of difficult names and style periods.
Each piece has a story to tell. So
you will read and write and memorize and write again – and discover, at the
very least, that someday when you walk into the Prado, the Louvre or the Metropolitan,
that you recognize and understand what you are seeing! GLI: This course participates in the Global Learning Initiative by
its very nature."
GNED:
ARTH 176 fulfills GNED requirements
for Historical Perspective and Humanities and the Arts.
Goal 1.1 Read, write and speak standard English is
met through writing assignments and essay exam questions, Goal 3.2 Analyze
and use a variety of information gathering techniques is met through the
research paper assignment, Goal 4. 1 Analyze diverse world
cultures, societies, languages, historical periods, and artistic expressions
and Goal 6.1 To understand aesthetic values, the
creative process, and the interconnectedness of the literary, visual, and
performing arts throughout the history of civilization are met
through reading, lecture, research and exams on course description content.
Expected
Learning Outcomes include recognition, understanding and appreciation for
the arts of Europe in the Renaissance through the Contemporary Periods
including comparisons with the arts of India, China, Japan and Africa expressed
through satisfactory written Standard English on exams as well as research
paper and competent citation skills used in research paper.
COURSE REQUIREMENTS: 100
points possible
3 exams (20 points each) 60
Texting Project 10
Essay
25
Attendance/Participation 5
Grading Scale:
94-100% = A; 90-93 = A-; 87-89 = B+; 84-86 = B;
80-83 = B-; 77-79 = C+; 74-76 =
C; 70-73 = C-; 67-69 = D+; 64-66 = D;
60-63 = D-; 59 or less = F
Extra Credit Opportunities: 2012 film
series 2 points per film, max 6 points (see schedule attached). Other events
tba,
CLASS
RULES:
Take LOTS of notes
Review Syllabus regularly & keep
up with readings
Please no
sleeping or head on desk!
More than 3 unexcused absences will
result in a loss of 5 points
More than 6 unexcused
absences = automatic F
Consistent texting, tardiness sleeping
or talking will count as an absence
Late work or Make up exams
unacceptable without written excuse fm doctor
Do not use your book during
class - listen & look at images
NO electronics (cell phones or ear
phones or computers) w/out permission
Do not enter or leave the class through the
front doors
If you have special needs for exams, etc.,
call Gina Smith X 2233
ARTH 176 Calendar (subject to change) Readings
in Adams
T Aug 21 |
Introduction
Intro & Ch. 12 |
|
R Aug 23 |
Early Renaissance
Ch 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T Aug 28 |
Early Renaissance |
|
R Aug 30 |
Early
Renaissance |
|
T Sep 4 |
High Renaissance
Ch 14 |
|
R Sep 6 |
High Renaissance |
|
T Sep 11 |
Texting Composition Day
in class |
|
R Sep 13 |
Northern Europe 16th
Ch 16 |
|
T Sep 18 |
Mannerism Exam One
Study Guide |
|
R Sep 20 |
Mannerism |
|
T Sep 25 |
EXAM 1
|
|
R Sep 27 |
Baroque / Mughal Art
Ch 17 & p666-8 |
|
T Oct 2 |
Baroque / Rococo
Ch 18 |
|
R Oct 4 |
Neo-classicism
Ch 19 |
|
T Oct 9 |
Romanticism
Ch 20 |
|
R Oct 11 |
Realism
Ch 21
|
|
T Oct 16 |
Impressionism Exam Two Study Guide Ch 22 Paper
Topic (typed) with art work DUE |
|
R Oct 18 |
Impressionism / Japan (SECAC) |
|
|
|
|
T Oct 23 |
EXAM 2
- |
|
R Oct 25 |
Post Impressionism
Ch 23 |
|
T Oct 30 |
Fin de Siècle, etc.
Ch 24 |
|
R Nov 1 |
Expressionism
Ch 25 |
|
T Nov 6 |
Cubism / Africa
Ch 25 & 832-5 |
|
R Nov 8 |
Dada / Surrealism Ch
26 |
|
T Nov 13 |
Abstract Expressionism Ch 27 |
|
R Nov 15 |
Pop Ch 28 Paper Assignment Due |
|
T Nov 20 |
Political/ Site Specific Ch 29 R Nov. 22nd Thanksgiving break! |
|
T Nov 27 |
Post-Modern |
|
R Nov 29 |
Last Day Evaluations/ Exam Study guide 3 Available FINAL EXAM 9AM WED. DEC. 6TH |
|
|
|
ASSIGNMENTS |
|
TEXTING PROJECT - IN CLASS 9/11
- 10 points Instructions to be given in class. |
COMPARATIVE
ESSAY *
25 POINTS
§
Topic due Oct 16
§
Final
Paper DUE Nov 15
TOPIC:
1. Choose
a work of art from your book which you would like to explore. (only 2 people on any one work, first come,
first serve!)
2. Look
at museums online and find another work of art by a DIFFERENT artist exploring
the SAME SUBJECT (ex. portrait, landscape, church, palace, nativity, abstract
etc)
3. Write
a comparative essay of these two works
FORMAT:
§ Must be stapled, or in folder
§ 5-6 double spaced typed
pages, standard font & margin
§ Images of works discussed
§ Must have in text
citations!!! (ex. Smith 24)
§ Bibliography:
-3 sources in
ADDITION to Adams
-at
least one museum website
-Cite
website sources properly!!
·
Submit
entire paper digitally to Turnitin
(Dacus online) but keep a copy in your records
PAPER WILL NOT BE
ACCEPTED WITHOUT:
BIBLIOGRAPHY, IMAGES, IN TEXT CITATIONS
CONTENT:
Two works of
art, one from your book, one of your choice from museum website (see my website
for help with museums if needed)
The
purpose of this assignment is for you to learn how to write a
comparison essay on two
works of art with regard to both subject and style
as well as to become familiar with a great museum website.
Once you have two works (approved by me) you may begin your essay
Be sure to:
-subject (meaning?)
-style (COMPOSITION
FIRST, line, color, etc. see handout).
To see an example of a great
comparative essay in Sylvan Barnett’s A
Short Guide to Writing About Art on my website.
Do
YOU KNOW what PLAGARISM is?? Make sure
you do!
All ideas
as well as quotes must be properly cited in the body of your paper either with
author & page number (ex: Smith 53), endnote or footnote. To prevent plagiarism and errors in citation,
all papers must be submitted
to Turnitin via Dacus Library homepage.
Turn-it-in name: ARTH
176
Enrollment
password: dufresne
Class id: 5368426
**CASE SENSITIVE**
* Art Introductory Study Guide *
STYLE: The way
in which a thing is done.
FORMAL ELEMENTS:
These are the visual elements of creating style:
1. COMPOSITION: ALWAYS START YOUR ANALYSIS WITH THIS!!! The
arrangement of the artwork. Where
is everything? At the top, bottom,
middle…lower left? Is it balanced,
symmetrical, organized in registers, diagonals?
2. SCALE: Size:
a) Bigger than a breadbox? Colossal? Tiny? b) In a painting or relief-
forms in relationship to one another.
(Are the people bigger than the house?)
3. SHAPE: Geometric? Soft, indistinct? Irregular? 3-d? 2-d?
4. MEDIUM: Material the work is made of: bronze, wood, marble,
paper, mosaic, fresco, oil, clay, watercolor, pastel, woodcut, engraving,
plastic, trash…
5. SPACE: Is there an illusion of depth? Why or why
not? Are the shapes shaded & modeled
to suggest 3-d? Are the items in the
background softly indicated to suggest distance? Does the design stress the 2-d aspect of the
surface?
6. COLOR: What are the colors: Warm, cold, monochromatic, bright, subdued,
or muddy? What does this contribute to
the work?
7. LINE: Thick, even, curvilinear, uneven, jerky,
straight, ragged, sketchy? Are the forms
strongly outlined? Is line used within
the form?
8. TEXTURE: Is the
surface rough, smooth, textured paper, thick paint? Is it indicated in a painting? Ex.
Stubby beard, satin gown
9. MOVEMENT: Do the forms imply movement (diagonals) or
stability (triangles) or rest (horizontals)?
10. TONE: what is the emotional feeling implied by the
piece? (Active, still, violent, serene,
harsh, melancholy) Is it intended by the
artist, or is it your personal reaction?
ICONOGRAPHY:
meaning, symbolism, and subject matter in art
FUNCTION: What is the purpose of the piece? How was it used? How does that affect its appearance? Is it a jug, a church, a portrait? Is it narrative, symbolic, decorative, or
religious, political, secular? Also,
consider the following:
·
WHO: Who made
it? Who was it made for? (group of people)
·
WHAT: What is
it? What is its subject? Does it do anything?
·
WHEN: When was
it made? (What century or era?)
·
WHERE: In what
country and or city? Significance of
cites.
·
WHY: Why was it
made; for what purpose? Is it
functional? What does the object
suggest about the society to which the artist belonged?
·
HOW: How was it
made? What was the process
utilized?
Most Common
(Dufresne 2006)
-no staple or folder to protect work
-no Bibliography
or works cited page
- did not fully cite sources in bibliography–
-did not underline
or italicize all book or journal
titles
- put all article
titles in “quotes” or italicize
(italicize article title only
if you did not italicize book or
journal)
-no citations used
throughout text
-do NOT cite entire book title or
internet address in text!!
Use author’s last name and page number only –
if unknown abbreviate title & use
(ps that’s why I prefer footnotes or endnotes)
-poor quality image
-image unidentified by artist, title, medium, date, provenance
-using contractions in a formal paper
-too many quotes
-quotes too long – should paraphrase
-did not indent and single space long quotes.
(Best quotes are primary source materials)
-used slang in a formal paper (ok in creative writing or personal essay –
not in a formal research paper)
-poor or unvaried WC (word choice)
Use a thesaurus!
-cluttered sentence structure – too many words!
If this is your problem learn to simplify by shortening sentences
-run on sentences (see above)
-fragmented sentences (lacks a verb!)
-redundant (saying the same thing over and over)
-typographical errors
-spelling errors
-reads like a rough draft – see all of the above & below
Content errors:
-did not follow instructions
-incorrect or inappropriate topic
-art works discussed not relevant to topic or time period
- generalizations based on too little evidence – be careful!
- not focused, too broad and general in approach
- did not discuss meaning OR PURPOSE of art
-did not discuss context of art (time period, religion, culture, politics etc)
- did not discuss function of art
-did not discuss medium of art
-did not discuss composition or arrangement of forms or objects in art
-disorganized– need to make categories to order presentation of material
-factual errors
-sub-standard research materials