CRTW 201
Dr. DeRochi
Thinking Through the Problem
Due Date: Monday, September 20th, by 5:00 via turnitin.com.
Context: So far this session, we've discussed those common
filters that often become impediments to our own critical thinking, and we've
now studied the elements of reasoning that are necessary for us to
improve our critical thinking processes. So, this assignment simply asks
you to apply these skills to a current problem you're facing. Remember,
CRTW 201 is the "real-world" course--how do
you apply your skill sets to REAL questions.
Assignment: Each of you have a pressing question facing you right now.
Perhaps you're wondering if you should choose a major or perhaps change a major,
perhaps you're considering getting a job to help
offset your bills and tuition, maybe you're thinking about breaking up with your
significant other, or joining (or quitting) an organization or activity.
Perhaps you're considering grad school or
where to go for grad school. Whatever the problem is, there is a specific question at issue that you no doubt must answer.
Your assignment is this: write a 6-7 page essay in which you document your critical thinking process for answering this question.
Don't get intimidated by the length! Length will NOT be a problem given that
you will be working your way through all of the elements of reasoning.
Be sure to follow the instructions
below as to how to construct / organize your essay.
The Essay:
The Introduction. In your introduction, set up the "Context" for
your question at issue; prove how significant and pressing this question may be
and why you believe your critical thinking skills
need to be at their highest level. State your "question at issue"
outright, and be sure to illustrate how this question links to your broader
"purpose." and use your Thesis Statement to transition into
an analysis of your critical thinking process.
Next, before presenting your elements of reasoning, identify and discuss
3 potential impediments specifically. Obviously, given the
importance of this question, you are obviously brining certain
"thinking baggage" into the equation. How might these problematic? In what
specific ways? This part of the paper is a common rhetorical move in all
papers--it sets up the foundation for the rest
of the analysis.
The Body. The rest of your paper should succinctly and concretely
document all your elements of reasoning and how they apply to the question at
issue. Discuss at length your assumptions, the
information you need to know in order to make the decision, the conclusions you
hope to make based on that information. Also be sure to identify and explain the
concepts that are influencing
your thinking on the matter, as well as how your "point of view" may be important to
consider. The final part of your paper should illustrate the extent to
which you've analyzed the implications of
your thinking and this decision.
The Conclusion. So what? As with any essay, conclusions to papers
should always answer the question, "so what"? Why did you write this? Why is
this question important? Where should we
(you) go from here? What do you imagine your decision is at this point? What
might change your thinking? Are you ready to make the call now? Why or why not?